Maternal red blood cell alloimmunization prevalence in the United States.

Hemolytic disease of fetus and newborn (HDFN) is a life-threatening disease mediated by maternal alloimmunization to red blood cell (RBC) antigens. Studies of maternal alloimmunization prevalence in the United States (U.S.) lack national data. This study describes prevalence and trends in alloimmunization in pregnancy in the U.S. RBC antibodies (abs) were identified in a large, nationwide, commercial laboratory database from 2010-2021. The cohort comprised pregnancies for which the year of lab collection and patient's state of residence were available. Data were normalized based on U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates of live births and weighted by year and U.S. Census Division. Cochrane-Armitage tests assessed temporal trends of alloimmunization. Of 9,876,196 pregnancies, 1.5% (147,262) screened positive for RBC abs, corresponding to an estimated prevalence of 1,518/100,000 pregnancies. Of identified RBC abs, anti-D comprised 64.1% (586/100,000 pregnancies). Prevalence of other high-risk RBC abs for HDFN included anti-K (68/100,000) and anti-c (29/100,000). Incidence of all three high-risk abs increased from 2010-21 (all p<0.001). Among almost 10 million pregnancies in the US, comprising an estimated 14.4% of all pregnancies, 1.5% screened positive for RBC abs. Almost three-quarters (74.3%; 683/100,000) of RBC abs identified were high-risk for HDFN. Though prevalence of anti-D is difficult to interpret without the ability to distinguish alloimmunization from passive immunity, it remains problematic in HDFN, ranking second only to anti-K in critical titers. Given the sequelae of HDFN, new initiatives are required to reduce the incidence of alloimmunization in patients of reproductive potential.

Hospital Discharge Codes and Overestimating Severe Maternal Morbidity During Delivery Hospitalization.

Our objective was to identify birth hospitalization severe maternal morbidity (SMM) diagnoses that were also coded during prior encounters and, thus, potentially falsely carried forward as de novo SMM events. This retrospective cohort study included pregnant patients with births between 2016 and 2020. We applied the SMM algorithm to the birth hospitalization and encounters occurring prepregnancy, antepartum, and postpartum. The primary outcome was the rate of SMM diagnoses recorded during the birth hospitalization that were also coded on previous encounters. There were 1,380 (1.8%) birthing patients with SMM. Of patients with SMM codes at the birth hospitalization, 19.0% had the same SMM code during a prior encounter. Certain SMM events may be prone to carry-forward errors and may not signify a de novo birth hospitalization event.

Maternal Morbidity According to Mode of Delivery Among Pregnant Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary hypertension have a high risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. It is unknown if a trial of labor carries a lower risk of morbidity in these patients compared to a planned cesarean delivery. The objective of this study was to examine the association of delivery mode with severe maternal morbidity events during delivery hospitalization among patients with pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Premier inpatient administrative database. Patients delivering ≥25 weeks gestation from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020, and with pulmonary hypertension were included. The primary analysis compared intended vaginal delivery (ie, trial of labor) to intended cesarean delivery (intention to treat analysis). A sensitivity analysis was conducted comparing vaginal delivery to cesarean delivery (as treated analysis). The primary outcome was nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity during the delivery hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion (4 or more units) and readmission to the delivery hospital within 90 days from discharge from delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 727 deliveries. In the primary analysis, there was no difference in nontransfusion morbidity between intended vaginal delivery and intended cesarean delivery groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.15). In secondary analyses, intended cesarean delivery was not associated with blood transfusion (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.34-1.50) or readmission within 90 days (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32-1.14). In the sensitivity analysis, cesarean delivery was associated with a 3-fold higher risk of nontransfusion morbidity compared to vaginal delivery (aOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.54-3.93), a 3-fold higher risk of blood transfusion (aOR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.17-7.99), and a 2-fold higher risk of readmission within 90 days (aOR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.09-4.46) compared to vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Among pregnant patients with pulmonary hypertension, a trial of labor was not associated with a higher risk of morbidity compared to an intended cesarean delivery. One-third of patients who required an intrapartum cesarean delivery had a morbidity event, demonstrating the increased risk of adverse events in this group.

Racial and ethnic disparities in eligibility for postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence differs by race and ethnicity in the United States. However, it is unclear whether the eligibility criteria for postpartum VTE prophylaxis mirror this disparity. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the prevalence of risk factors and eligibility for postpartum VTE prophylaxis, among US Birthing people, stratified by race and ethnicity. METHODS: We analyzed the National Inpatient Sample from October 2015 to December 2019, using diagnosis and procedure codes to identify postpartum individuals and their VTE risk factors. We compared proportion of delivery hospitalizations meeting eligibility for thromboprophylaxis stratified by race or ethnicity, according to American College of Gynecology and Obstetrics, American College of Chest Physicians, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG), and American Society for Hematology guidelines. RESULTS: Among a national estimate of 14 967 861 delivery hospitalizations in the United States, the proportion of individuals eligible for thromboprophylaxis using the RCOG, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and American Society for Hematology guidelines were 32.9%, 8.0%, 0.2%, and 0.2%, respectively. Using the RCOG criteria, non-Hispanic Black individuals had the highest proportion of thromboprophylaxis eligibility (39.7%), whereas it was lowest among Hispanic individuals (30.8%). Racial disparities in thromboprophylaxis eligibility were driven by differences in clinical risk factors (38.8% non-Hispanic Black population vs 30.5% Hispanic population) and cesarean section rates (35.9% vs 32.2%), rather than history of VTE (0.3% vs 0.1%), inherited thrombophilia (0.2% vs 0.2%), or sickle cell disease (0.4% vs <0.1%). CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic Black individuals were most likely to qualify for postpartum thromboprophylaxis, attributable to clinical risk factors rather than inherited risk factors. An urgent need exists to better understand ethno-racial disparities in thromboprophylaxis use and to equitably address modifiable risk factors for postpartum VTE.

Validation of Three Models for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Delivery Admission.

OBJECTIVE: Prediction of blood transfusion during delivery admission allows for clinical preparedness and risk mitigation. Although prediction models have been developed and adopted into practice, their external validation is limited. We aimed to evaluate the performance of three blood transfusion prediction models in a U.S. cohort of individuals undergoing cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of tranexamic acid for prevention of hemorrhage at time of cesarean delivery. Three models were considered: a categorical risk tool (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative [CMQCC]) and two regression models (Ahmadzia et al and Albright et al). The primary outcome was intrapartum or postpartum red blood cell transfusion. The CMQCC algorithm was applied to the cohort with frequency of risk category (low, medium, high) and associated transfusion rates reported. For the regression models, the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) was calculated and a calibration curve plotted to evaluate each model's capacity to predict receipt of transfusion. The regression model outputs were statistically compared. RESULTS: Of 10,785 analyzed individuals, 3.9% received a red blood cell transfusion during delivery admission. The CMQCC risk tool categorized 1,970 (18.3%) individuals as low risk, 5,259 (48.8%) as medium risk, and 3,556 (33.0%) as high risk with corresponding transfusion rates of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-2.9%), 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8-2.6%), and 7.5% (95% CI: 6.6-8.4%), respectively. The AUC for prediction of blood transfusion using the Ahmadzia and Albright models was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.81) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82), respectively (p = 0.38 for difference). Calibration curves demonstrated overall agreement between the predicted probability and observed likelihood of blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Three models were externally validated for prediction of blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission in this U.S. COHORT: Overall, performance was moderate; model selection should be based on ease of application until a specific model with superior predictive ability is developed. KEY POINTS: · A total of 3.9% of individuals received a blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission.. · Three models used in clinical practice are externally valid for blood transfusion prediction.. · Institutional model selection should be based on ease of application until further research identifies the optimal approach..

Induced Abortion for Maternal Cardiac Indication: 2 Cases of Unintended Pregnancy With LVAD.

We present 2 cases of patients with left ventricular assist device who underwent an induced abortion in the first and second trimester, respectively. Comprehensive counseling is critical for this patient population, and close coordination of interdisciplinary teams is required in the setting of continuing pregnancy or medically indicated abortion.

Severe Maternal Morbidity According to Mode of Delivery Among Pregnant Patients With Cardiomyopathies.

BACKGROUND: Women with cardiomyopathies are at risk for pregnancy complications. The optimal mode of delivery in these patients is guided by expert opinion and limited small studies. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to examine the association of delivery mode with severe maternal morbidity events during delivery hospitalization and readmissions among patients with cardiomyopathies. METHODS: The Premier inpatient administrative database was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with a diagnosis of a cardiomyopathy. Utilizing a target trial emulation strategy, the primary analysis compared outcomes among patients exposed to intended vaginal delivery vs intended cesarean delivery (intention to treat). A secondary analysis compared outcomes among patients who delivered vaginally vs by cesarean (as-treated). Outcomes examined were nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity during the delivery hospitalization, blood transfusion, and readmission. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 2,921 deliveries. In the primary analysis (intention to treat), there was no difference in nontransfusion morbidity (adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.91-1.51), blood transfusion (aOR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.81-1.98), or readmission (aOR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.73-1.44) between intended vaginal delivery and intended cesarean delivery. In the as-treated analysis, cesarean delivery was associated with a 2-fold higher risk of nontransfusion morbidity (aOR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.85-3.22) and blood transfusion (aOR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.34-3.81) when compared with vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiomyopathies, a trial of labor does not confer a higher risk of maternal morbidity, blood transfusion, or readmission compared with planned cesarean delivery.

Maternal and Pregnancy Outcomes Following Heart Transplantation in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Improved survival following heart transplantation (HT) has led to more recipients contemplating pregnancy, but data on outcomes are limited. OBJECTIVES: The authors used a national data set to investigate and describe outcomes of pregnancies and deliveries in the United States in HT recipients. METHODS: Diagnosis and procedure codes from the 2010-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database identified delivery hospitalizations, history of HT, comorbid conditions, and outcomes. The authors compared rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM), nontransfusion SMM, cardiovascular SMM (cSMM), and preterm birth from delivery hospitalization between HT recipients and no-HT recipients. The authors evaluated readmission to 330 days postpartum. Logistic and proportional hazard regressions were performed, adjusting for age, socioeconomic and facility characteristics, and clinical comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 19,399,521 deliveries, 105 were HT recipients. Compared with no-HT, HT recipients were at higher risk for all SMM (24.8% vs 1.7%), nontransfusion SMM (20.8% vs 0.7%), cSMM (7.3% vs 0.12%), and preterm birth (43.3% vs 8.2%), all P < 0.001. In adjusted analyses, HT recipients had 16-fold greater odds of SMM, 28-fold greater odds of nontransfusion SMM, 38-fold greater odds of cSMM, and 7-fold greater odds of preterm birth. HT recipients had higher morbidity rates during delivery hospitalization and higher readmission rates within 1 year following delivery (26.9% vs 3.8%; adjusted HR: 6.03 [95% CI: 3.73-9.75]). CONCLUSIONS: Delivery with history of HT is associated with significantly increased rates of SMM, preterm birth, and hospital readmission. These results provide data regarding pregnancy outcomes for use when counseling patients with HT history who are considering pregnancy or who are pregnant.

Projected impact of guidelines on incidence of venous thromboembolism after cesarean delivery in the United States.

BACKGROUND: There is large variation in recommended for postcesarean delivery venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among commonly used guidelines. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to estimate implications of adoption of VTE prevention guidelines for rates of receipt of VTE prophylactic therapy and VTE following cesarean delivery (CD). METHODS: We used administrative data from the 2015-2019 Nationalwide Readmissions Database to identify cesarean deliveries and rates of VTE stratified by risk factors, leading to different prophylactic strategies based on several national guidelines. We used input parameters from the literature to construct a hybrid decision tree/Markov model to project the implications of guideline adoption on VTE rates for the first 6 weeks following delivery. RESULTS: Adoption of either the 2011 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists or the 2018 American Society for Hematology guidelines would avert a relatively small proportion (5%) of VTE cases, albeit with little low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) use (87-115 doses per 1000 CD patients). The 2012 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines were predicted to be more effective at averting VTE (21.2% reduction) with more LMWH usage (570 doses per 1000 deliveries). The 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines and universal use of 6 weeks of LMWH would avert an even larger proportion of cases (37.4% and 57.6%, respectively), at the cost of much higher rates of LMWH utilization (7233 doses per 1000 patients and 38 648 doses per 1000 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Adoption of different guidelines would have notably varying implications for clinical practice and potential for alteration of the national rate of VTE following CD.

Maternal morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer at time of delivery.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with cancer during pregnancy are a medically complex patient population that is anticipated to grow. A better understanding of this population and patterns of risk at time of delivery would offer an opportunity for providers to mitigate maternal morbidity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence in the United States of concurrent cancer diagnoses at time of delivery by cancer type and associated maternal morbidity and mortality. STUDY DESIGN: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we identified delivery-associated hospitalizations between 2007 and 2018. Concurrent cancer diagnoses were classified using the Clinical Classifications Software. Main outcomes included severe maternal morbidity, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicators, and mortality during delivery hospitalization. We calculated adjusted rates for cancer diagnosis at time of delivery and adjusted odds ratios of severe maternal morbidity and maternal death during hospitalization using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: In this sample of 9,418,761 delivery-associated hospitalizations, 63 per 100,000 deliveries had a concurrent cancer diagnosis (95% confidence interval, 60-66; national weighted estimate, 46,654,042). The most common cancer types were breast cancer (8.4 per 100,000 deliveries), leukemia (8.4 per 100,000 deliveries), Hodgkin lymphoma (7.4 per 100,000 deliveries), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (5.4 per 100,000 deliveries), and thyroid cancer (4.0 per 100,000 deliveries). Patients with cancer were at significantly higher risk for any severe maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 5.25; 95% confidence interval, 4.73-5.83) and maternal death (adjusted odds ratio, 67.5; 95% confidence interval, 45.1-101.4). Risks of hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 16.92; 95% confidence interval, 13.96-20.52), acute respiratory distress (adjusted odds ratio, 12.76; 95% confidence interval, 9.92-16.42), sepsis (adjusted odds ratio, 11.91; 95% confidence interval, 8.68-16.32), and embolism (adjusted odds ratio, 11.12; 95% confidence interval, 6.94-17.82) were particularly heightened among patients with cancer. Patients with leukemia, specifically, had the highest risk of adverse maternal outcomes (adjusted rate, 113 per 1000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 91-135 per 1000) when evaluating risk by cancer type. CONCLUSION: Patients with cancer are at markedly increased risk of maternal morbidity and all-cause mortality during delivery-associated hospitalization. Risk is distributed unevenly within this population, with certain cancer types carrying unique risks for specific morbidity events.

High rates of venous thromboembolism among deliveries complicated by cancer.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk is increased independently by both cancer and pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: To estimate VTE risk in the postpartum period among patients delivering with a cancer diagnosis, stratified by cancer type and delivery route. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing the large, all-payer Nationwide Readmissions Database from October 2015 through December 2020. We identified delivery hospitalizations, cancer diagnoses, and VTE using patient demographics and diagnosis codes. The primary outcome was VTE incidence at 42 and 330 days from delivery admission date, comparing patients with and without cancer diagnoses. A secondary analysis included VTE risk stratified by cancer diagnosis and delivery route. Outcomes were compared using inverse probability-weighted survival curves. RESULTS: The study population included 9 793 503 delivery hospitalizations (weighted estimate, 18 207 346), with a weighted estimate of 10 428 (0.06%) pregnant patients with cancer. Individuals with cancer were older, with higher rates of comorbid conditions, than those without cancer. VTE incidence in individuals with cancer at 42 and 330 days was 1.11% and 2.19%, respectively, vs 0.11% and 0.14%, respectively, in those without cancer. At 330 days, this finding was significant in both unadjusted (relative risk, 15.52; 95% CI, 11.54-19.51) and adjusted (relative risk, 9.68; 95% CI, 7.18-12.18) models. Stratification by cancer type and delivery route demonstrated elevated VTE risk across cancer types, with cesarean delivery conferring a greater risk. CONCLUSION: Cancer in pregnancy confers excess thromboembolic risk extending beyond the immediate postpartum period. Further study is needed to identify optimal VTE prophylactic strategies for this population.

Risk of stillbirth in United States patients with diagnosed intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with a 4- to 10-fold increase in the risk of stillbirth in the absence of intervention, leading to recommendations for antenatal assessment, ursodiol use, and often preterm or early term delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether current management strategies for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy mitigate the elevated risk of stillbirth at a population level. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2015-2020 National Readmissions Database, an administrative database developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Our study identified delivery hospitalizations, gestational age at delivery, occurrence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and stillbirth, and comorbid conditions using the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis and procedure codes. Moreover, this study compared the timing of delivery and stillbirth rates of pregnant patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy vs those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy at the time of delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: This study identified a cohort of 9,987,705 delivery hospitalizations in the National Readmissions Database, corresponding to a weighted national estimate of 18,609,207 births. Of these births, 152,040 (0.8%) were noted to have an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis. Patients with an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis were older, with small differences in comorbidities, such as a higher rate of gestational diabetes mellitus, than patients without an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis at delivery hospitalization. The overall rates of stillbirth were lower among those with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy than among those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (252 vs 386 per 100,000 deliveries; risk difference, 133 fewer per 100,000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 98-170), a finding that persisted after adjustment for insurance status, socioeconomic factors, and comorbid conditions (risk difference, 160 fewer stillbirths per 100,000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 127-194). Furthermore, although patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy were more likely to deliver before term than those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (30.1% vs 9.3%; P<.001), increased rates of stillbirth were not noted at any point after stratification of the cohort by gestational age at delivery. CONCLUSION: Patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis codes delivered earlier than those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis codes, but the percentage of births affected by stillbirth was lower, even when stratifying for gestational age at birth. These results may provide reassurance to patients receiving an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis that current management does mitigate stillbirth risk in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Associations between Anemia and Outcomes of Pregnant Patients with Pyelonephritis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine if pregnant patients with both pyelonephritis and anemia are at an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes compared with those with pyelonephritis without anemia. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). Patients with antepartum pyelonephritis-associated hospitalizations from October 2015 to December 2018 were included. International Classification of Diseases codes were used to identify pyelonephritis, anemia, maternal comorbidities, and severe maternal morbidities. The primary outcome was a composite of severe maternal morbidity, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control criteria. Univariate statistical methods, weighted to account for complex survey methods in the NRD, were used to assess for associations between anemia, baseline characteristics, and patient outcomes. Weighted logistic and Poisson regressions were used to assess for associations between anemia and outcomes, adjusting for clinical comorbidities and other confounding factors. RESULTS: In total, 29,296 pyelonephritis admissions were identified, corresponding to a weighted national estimate of 55,135 admissions. Of these, 11,798 (21.3%) were anemic. The rate of severe maternal morbidity was higher among anemic patients than nonanemic patients (27.8% vs. 8.9%, respectively, p < 0.001), and remained higher after adjustment (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 2.86 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.67, 3.06]). Rates of individual components of severe maternal morbidities, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (4.0% vs. 0.6%, aRR 3.97 [95% CI: 3.10, 5.08]), sepsis (22.5% vs. 7.9%, aRR 2.64 [95% CI: 2.45, 2.85]), shock (4.5% vs. 0.6%, aRR 5.48 [95% CI: 4.32, 6.95]), and acute renal failure (2.9% vs. 0.8%, aRR 1.99 [95% CI: 1.55, 2.55]) were all higher for anemic pyelonephritis. The mean length of stay was also longer (25% average increase, 95% CI: 22%, 28%). CONCLUSION: Among pregnant patients with pyelonephritis, those with anemia are at greater risk of severe maternal morbidity and longer hospital stay. KEY POINTS: · Anemia is associated with longer stays for pyelo.. · Anemic pyelo patients have increased morbidity.. · Anemic pyelo patients have increased sepsis risk..

Validation of a sonographic checklist for the detection of histologic placenta accreta spectrum.

BACKGROUND: To standardize research terminology and to reduce unanticipated placenta accreta spectrum, the European Working Group for Abnormally Invasive Placenta developed a consensus checklist for reporting suspected placenta accreta spectrum observed during an antenatal ultrasound. The diagnostic accuracy of the European Working Group for Abnormally Invasive Placenta checklist has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the performance of the European Working Group for Abnormally Invasive Placenta sonographic checklist in predicting histologic placenta accreta spectrum. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multisite, blinded, retrospective review of transabdominal ultrasound studies performed between 26 to 32 weeks' gestation for subjects with histologic placenta accreta spectrum between 2016 and 2020. We matched a control cohort of subjects without histologic placenta accreta spectrum in a 1:1 ratio. To reduce reader bias, we matched the control cohort for known risk factors including previa, number of previous cesarean deliveries, previous dilation and curettage, in vitro fertilization, and clinical factors affecting image quality including multiple gestation, body mass index, and gestational age at the ultrasound. Nine sonologists from 5 referral centers, blinded to the histologic outcomes, interpreted the randomized ultrasound studies using the European Working Group for Abnormally Invasive Placenta checklist. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the checklist to predict placenta accreta spectrum. Two separate sensitivity analyses were performed. First, we excluded subjects with mild disease (ie, only assessed subjects with histologic increta and percreta). Second, we excluded interpretations from the 2 most junior sonologists. RESULTS: A total of 78 subjects were included (39 placenta accreta spectrum, 39 matched control). Clinical risk factors and image quality markers were statistically similar between the cohorts. The checklist sensitivity (95% confidence interval) was 76.6% (63.4-90.6) and the specificity (95% confidence interval) was 92.0% (63.4-99.9) with a positive and negative likelihood ratio of 9.6 and 0.3, respectively. When we excluded subjects with mild placenta accreta spectrum disease, the sensitivity (95% confidence interval) increased to 84.7% (73.6-96.4) and the specificity was unchanged at 92.0% (83.2-99.9). Sensitivity and specificity were unchanged when the interpretations from the 2 most junior sonologists were excluded. CONCLUSION: The 2016 European Working Group for Abnormally Invasive Placenta checklist for interpreting placenta accreta spectrum has a reasonable performance in detecting histologic placenta accreta spectrum and excluding cases without placenta accreta spectum.

Multidisciplinary care of the pregnant patient with or at risk for venous thromboembolism: a recommended toolkit from the Foundation for Women and Girls with Blood Disorders Thrombosis Subcommittee.

The care of pregnant persons with/at risk of venous thromboembolism is complex and often challenging. Although guidelines have been published regarding the use of specific therapies, such as anticoagulants; in this population, none have provided guidance on how to coordinate multidisciplinary care of these patients. Here we provide an expert consensus on the role of various providers in the care of this patient population, as well as necessary resources and suggestions for best practices.

Mode of delivery among women with maternal cardiac disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if maternal cardiac disease affects delivery mode and to investigate maternal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study performed using electronic medical record data. Primary outcome was mode of delivery; secondary outcomes included indication for cesarean delivery, and rates of severe maternal morbidity. RESULTS: Among 14,160 deliveries meeting inclusion criteria, 218 (1.5%) had maternal cardiac disease. Cesarean delivery was more common in women with maternal cardiac disease (adjusted odds ratio 1.63 [95% confidence interval 1.18-2.25]). Patients delivered by cesarean delivery in the setting of maternal cardiac disease had significantly higher rates of severe maternal morbidity, with a 24.38-fold higher adjusted odds of severe maternal morbidity (95% confidence interval: 10.56-54.3). CONCLUSION: While maternal cardiac disease was associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery, most were for obstetric indications. Additionally, cesarean delivery in the setting of maternal cardiac disease is associated with high rates of severe maternal morbidity.

Maternal Cardiovascular Morbidity Events Following Preeclampsia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with preeclampsia are at high risk for long-term cardiovascular events, yet the short-term, acute cardiovascular complications that follow preeclampsia are understudied. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term, acute maternal cardiovascular morbidity events after delivery among patients with a diagnosis of preeclampsia versus those without this diagnosis. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the Premier inpatient database was used to examine a cohort of obstetric patients older than 18 years, who delivered from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020. A diagnosis of preeclampsia and preeclampsia with severe features during delivery hospitalization were the exposures of interest. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events during delivery hospital admission. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events during a readmission within 90 days of delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: In total, 4,488,759 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 158,114 (3.5%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia without severe features, and 117,940 (2.6%) with preeclampsia with severe features. Adjusted odds of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events were higher in patients with preeclampsia and in those with preeclampsia with severe features compared with those without preeclampsia during delivery hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] 1.87 [1.78-1.97] and 4.74 [4.44-5.05], respectively) and within 90 days (adjusted OR [95% CI] 2.01 [1.83-2.21] and 2.32 [2.10-2.57], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with both preeclampsia and preeclampsia with severe features have higher rates of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events than those without preeclampsia. Future studies are necessary to examine which patients with preeclampsia are at highest risk for cardiovascular complications.

Pregnancy-Associated Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy has increased in the adult population. Studies from the H1N1 influenza pandemic suggest that ECMO deployment in pregnancy is associated with favorable outcomes. With increasing numbers of pregnant women affected by COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) and potentially requiring this life-saving therapy, we sought to compare comorbidities, costs, and outcomes between pregnancy- and nonpregnancy-associated ECMO therapy among reproductive-aged female patients. STUDY DESIGN: We used the 2013 to 2019 National Readmissions Database. Diagnosis and procedural coding were used to identify ECMO deployment, potential indications, comorbid conditions, and pregnancy outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality during the patient's initial ECMO stay. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and hospital charges/costs, occurrence of thromboembolic or bleeding complications during ECMO hospitalization, and mortality and readmissions up to 330 days following ECMO stay. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to model the associations between pregnancy status and outcomes. RESULTS: The sample included 324 pregnancy-associated hospitalizations and 3,805 nonpregnancy-associated hospitalizations, corresponding to national estimates of 665 and 7,653 over the study period, respectively. Pregnancy-associated ECMO had lower incidence of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.75) and bleeding complications (aOR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.93). Length of stay was significantly shorter (adjusted rate ratio (aRR): 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.96) and total hospital costs were less (aRR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93). Differences in the incidence of thromboembolic events (aOR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.78-1.38) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy-associated ECMO therapy had lower incidence of in-hospital death, bleeding complications, total inpatient cost, and length of stay when compared with nonpregnancy-associated ECMO therapy without increased thromboembolic complications. Pregnancy-associated ECMO therapy should be offered to eligible patients. KEY POINTS: · Pregnancy-related ECMO use was compared with nonpregnant use.. · Outcomes were equal or favored pregnancy-related deployment.. · These data may be useful when considering ECMO use in pregnancy..